Drawing for T-77

USPTO serial 79190708

T-77

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5343153Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2017
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with T-77?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fungicides for agricultural useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 12, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 3, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance