Drawing for BB-PROTEC

USPTO serial 79190709

BB-PROTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5352510Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2017
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BB-PROTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Insecticides for agricultural use; insecticides for domestic useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 17, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 7, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 13, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance