USPTO serial 79190834
PAINTEXPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5293374Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2017
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAINTEXPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made thereof, not included in other classes, namely paper labels, paper tape, paper containers, cardboard containers, cardboard boxes, and cardboard tubes; printed matter namely paper signs, books, manuals, curricula, newsletters, informational cards, and brochures in the field of coating technology; photographs; engravings, namely photo engravings and print engravings; pamphlets in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; books in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; printed tickets; non-textile labels, namely paper labels, shipping labels, and adhesive labels; handbooks in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; catalogues in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; event programs in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; prospectuses in the field of coating technology and expositions for coating technology; packaging composed of paper or cardboard | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Arranging of fairs and exhibitions for trade or economic purposes; computer data management, namely updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; market studies; business inquiries; business appraisals; online advertising on a computer network; mail-order advertising; distribution of samples for advertising purposes; presentation of goods for advertising purposes; dissemination of advertising matter; rental of advertising space; advertising; collection of data in a central file for business purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of educational and entertainment conferences, conventions and symposiums in the field of coating technology; publication of electronic books and magazines on line; organization of live shows for entertainment purposes; arranging and conducting of seminars, colloquiums and workshops for entertainment brainstorming purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Reservation of hotels and temporary accommodation; hotel services; restaurant services; fast-food restaurants and snackbars and self-service restaurants; rental of conference rooms | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jürgen Haußmann
- Other trademarks owned by Jürgen Haußmann
- Other trademarks owned by Jürgen Haußmann
- Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Messe GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named PAINTEXPO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |