Drawing for PIGENTLE

USPTO serial 79191084

PIGENTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5173728Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2017
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIGENTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Platkin

Jamie E. Platkin Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pneumatic transport systems comprising pneumatic pumps, pneumatic tube and pipe conveyors, pneumatic transporters, conveyors and variable speed drives; pneumatic transporters; pneumatic conveyors; pneumatic tube conveyors ; pneumatic pumps; vacuum transport systems comprising vacuum pumps, vacuum transporters, conveyors, air driven ejectors, mechanical hoppers and speed controllers; machines, machine apparatus and machine equipment for pneumatic transport systems, namely, vacuum pumps, vacuum transporters, vacuum conveyors, air driven ejectors, mechanical hoppers and structural parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods; pneumatic transport systems consisting of fluid driven ejector-pumps, electric vacuum pumps, vacuum conveyors and feed-hoppers; pneumatic transport systems for industry, including the food and pharmaceutical industries comprising pneumatic pumps, pneumatic tube and pipe conveyors, pneumatic transporters, conveyors and variable speed drivesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 23, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 23, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jun 21, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 20, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 18, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 11, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance