Drawing for STIGERA

USPTO serial 79191268

STIGERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5163623Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2017
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STIGERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Leming

Christopher Leming Syngenta Crop Protection AGSchwarzwaldallee 215Basel, CH-4058SWITZERLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; Chemical preparations for the treatment of seeds; fertilizers; bio-stimulants for use in agriculture, horticulture, lands and forestry, namely, growth plants fertilizers, growth plants stimulants, plant growth nutrientsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 6, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 21, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 28, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 20, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 21, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance