USPTO serial 79191348
ANYGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANYGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
JUN-HWA JEONG RABIN & BERDO PC1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to online community site via internet; electronic bulletin board services that enables transmission of a variety of thematic information and opinions via internet; internet portal services, namely, providing telecommunications access to internet website portals; community services of smart phone applications, namely, providing telecommunications access to online communities for smartphone application developers; providing internet chatrooms; providing telecommunications access to online community forums and online community site on the internet; providing telecommunications access to mobile content via a smart phone; transmission of mobile content, namely, short messages via a smart phone; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; computer aided transmission of messages and images; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Internet broadcasting services; transmission of video and text via the applications for mobile devices; wireless and digital communication services, namely, transmission and delivery of digital music via wireless communication networks; providing access to the internet, namely, internet multi-user access providing services on internet; providing internet access to online and mobile social network services; providing online and mobile internet chat rooms; providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards; providing access to applications via internet and mobile networks; transmission of mobile contents via online networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |