USPTO serial 79191531
VEOLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEOLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart Gitler
Stewart Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management in the fields of corrective and preventive maintenance services for elevators, maintenance services for electric ladders, maintenance services for pedestrian crossings, maintenance services for heating equipment, maintenance services for air conditioning, maintenance services for power plants, construction services for power plants, repair services for power plants, installation services for air conditioning equipment, installation services for heating systems, installation services for power plants; installation services for elevators, and installation services for electric ladders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Corrective and preventive maintenance services for elevators; maintenance services for electric ladders; maintenance services for pedestrian crossings; maintenance services for heating equipment; maintenance services for air conditioning; maintenance services for power plants; construction services for power plants; repair services for power plants; installation services for air conditioning equipment; installation services for heating systems; Installation services for power plants; installation services for elevators; installation services for electric ladders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Energy management services, namely Engineering services in the field of energy efficiency, Research in the field of energy and renewable energy scientific and technological consulting services, as well as scientific and technical research and design services in the field of energy and renewable energy production; industrial analysis and research services in the field of energy and renewable energy production | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |