Drawing for PRIMUS

USPTO serial 79191717

PRIMUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5314189Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2017
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

Judith L. Grubner Arnstein & Lehr LLP161 N. Clark Street, Ste. 4200Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flour, namely spelt based and legume based flour; bakery products; bread; bread with vegetables and whole spelt flour; toast bread, ciabatta, croissants, baguettes, toasted bread, biscuits, and crackers, all of the above products made with whole spelt flour and legume flour; confectionery products, namely, biscuits, waffles, wafers, sweet and savory snacks in the nature of biscuits and crackers, all of the above products made with whole spelt flour and legume flour; flours for food use; mixtures of legume flour and whole spelt flourSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 27, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 11, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 10, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 12, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance