Drawing for AEVITAS

USPTO serial 79191724

AEVITAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AEVITAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shauna M. Wertheim

SHAUNA M WERTHEIM THE MARBURY LAW GROUP PLLC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR 15TH FLRESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical endoscopes; endoscopic equipment for medical purposes, namely, video processors for use in endoscopic exams; medical devices, namely, light source units for use in endoscopic exams; medical apparatus and instruments for use in endoscopic procedures, namely, cameras, lights, air and water pumps, foot switches for endoscopes; endoscopic forceps plug for medical use; carrying cases specially adapted for holding or carrying medical endoscopes; medical endoscopic treatment tools, namely, biopsy forceps, high frequency endoscopic treatment apparatus, basket forceps and injection needles; endoscopic washer for cleaning medical endoscopes; disinfectors for medical endoscopes, namely, autoclaves for medical use; cleaning brushes specially adapted for medical endoscopes; carrying carts specially adapted for carrying medical endoscopesABANDONED—
037Repair or maintenance of medical machines and apparatusABANDONED—
044Rental of medical machines and apparatusABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 25, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 31, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 2, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 2, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 15, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance