USPTO serial 79191905
GENEROUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5314193Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2017
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENEROUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Conte
James B. Conte Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper; cardboard; printed matter, namely, brand catalog in the field of gluten free food, prospectus in the field of gluten free food, display in the nature of printed charts for displaying information in the field of gluten free food; photographs; stationery; adhesives in the nature of glues for stationery or household purposes; printed instructional or teaching material, except apparatus, in the field of gluten free food; printing blocks; posters; cards, namely, promotional postcards; newspapers; printed prospectuses in the field of gluten free food; catalogs in the field of gluten free food; pamphlets in the field of gluten free food; calendars; graphic prints; table linen of paper | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; artificial coffee; rice; flour; cereal preparations, namely, cereal bars, breakfast cereals, baking mixes, gluten free flours; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, gluten free confectionery made of sugar; edible ices; sugar; honey; golden syrup; yeast; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; speculoos powder; cookies crumble in the nature of cookies in crumbled form; spices; ice for refreshment; sandwiches; cookies; cakes; confectionery made of sugar; chocolate; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| May 19, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2026 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |