USPTO serial 79191947
HEILEMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEILEMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell A. Tuchman
Mitchell A. Tuchman Morningstar Law Group112 W. Main St., 2nd FloorDurham, NC 27701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cocoa; marzipan; nougat; chocolates; sweets, namely, jelly candy, sugar drops and fudge; pastry; confectionery, namely, confectionery made of chocolate, including chocolate confectionery infused with alcoholic liqueurs, praline or marzipan and chocolate confectionery with truffle, coffee or nut brittle filling; chocolate products, namely, unfilled chocolate bars and chocolate bars filled with alcoholic liqueurs, alcoholic truffles, and coffee cremes, and chocolate bars with nuts; solid and hollow chocolate figures; chocolate-covered fruit | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |