Drawing for CIMELAX

USPTO serial 79191957

CIMELAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5505280Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2018
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CIMELAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lenny R. Jiang

Lenny R. Jiang PARATUS LAW GROUP, PLLC1765 Greensboro StationSuite 320Tysons Corner, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021[ Seal containers for preserving food in the nature of food preserving jars of glass; glass seal containers for preserving food in the nature of food preserving jars of glass; ] plastic seal container for preserving food in the nature of household containers for foods; [ goblets; basins as receptacles; ] lunch boxes; [ glass kitchen containers for dessert; mugs; saucers; salad bowls; tankards; soup bowls; tableware, namely, tea services in the nature of tableware; services, namely, dishes; table plates; shallow bowls; glass bowls; glass dishes; fruit bowls of glass; glass cups; dishes; cups of paper and plastic; paper cups; ] nests of food boxes; dishes for vegetables; cups; plastic cups; [ mess-tins; baskets for domestic use; trays for domestic purposes; ] kimchi containers; [ salt shakers; ] large bowls; household containers for side dishes; [ sugar bowls; Salt and pepper shakers; salt cellars; Picnic baskets sold empty; ] household containers for foodstuffs; [ Non-electric cooking steamers, in particular rice steamer; ] cruets; [ spice sets in the nature of spice racks; ] serving trays; ice trays; [ stands for seasoning bottles in the nature of spice racks; ] cutting boards for the kitchen; [ molds as kitchen utensils, in particular pancake mold, cookie mold, and cookery mold; spatulas as kitchen utensils; tea strainers; tea caddies; dishcloth hangers in the nature of clothes drying hangers; ] buckets; insulated bottles for cold water in the nature of thermal insulated bottled for food or beverages; isothermic bags; [ insulating flasks; ] insulated bottle in the nature of thermal insulated bottled for food or beverages; [ coolers in the nature of ice pails; drinking flasks for travelers; vacuum bottles; non-electric portable coldboxes; heatproof earthenware pans, namely, glass pans; pots, non-electric; pot lids; closures for pot lids in the nature of tension closing devices for potlids; frying pans, non-electric; non-electric egg poachers; non-electric stew-pans; non-electric pan sets for cooking; cooking pans, non-electric; kettles; spouts, in particular pouring and straining spouts; nonelectric casserole pans; non-electric cooking steamers; non-electric cauldrons; deep fryers, non-electric; washtubs; drying racks for laundry; ] dustbins; waste baskets; [ dust-pans; ] trash cans; [ soap boxes; soap holders; soap dispensers; dishes for soap; flat-iron stands; ironing boards; plastic bathtubs for children; soap brackets; glass vials for kitchen sold empty; glasses receptacles, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; ] plastic water bottles sold empty; kitchen containers for rice [ ; crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, servicing bowls and trays ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 10, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 17, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 17, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2017CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 10, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 21, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 4, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance