USPTO serial 79192234
TISSUEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5248176Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2017
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TISSUEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kisuk Lee
Kisuk Lee Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC7700 Bonhomme, Suite 400St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental instruments, namely, gingiva expanders; Dental instruments, namely, periodontium expanders; Dental tissue expanders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |