Drawing for AURELIA.

USPTO serial 79192468

AURELIA.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5461145Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2018
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AURELIA.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210-2206United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business advisory services relating to improving the operation and manufacturing efficiency in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; business advisory services relating to the paper, packaging and pulp industry; business consultancy in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; computer data processing of measurements taken during the operation and manufacturing in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; conducting of business operation and manufacturing efficiency appraisals in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; consultancy relating to business efficiency in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; consultancy relating to data processing in the operation and manufacturing in the paper, packaging and pulp industry; business data analysis of measurements taken during the operation and manufacturing in the paper, packaging and pulp industry including ZD (Z-direction) non-destructive stiffness measurements, on-line continuous ZD non-destructive stiffness measurements and on-line MD shear stiffness measurements in the nature of corrugated board; professional business consultancy relating to improving the operation and manufacturing efficiency in the paper, packaging and pulp industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 11, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 30, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance