USPTO serial 79192483
WISTRIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WISTRIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software recorded programs; software for management of controlled environments, particularly of clean rooms; alarm and security systems for the protection of property and persons; user manuals and instructional books featuring information in the fields of computer software and computer software development, in electronic form or on electronic media | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; training; organization of courses and seminars in the field of computers and software; training for users of installed computer applications; practical training demonstration; organization and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, congresses and training workshops in the field of computers and software; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; publication of texts (other than advertising texts) including electronic publication; electronic publication of books and periodicals on-line; providing online electronic publications, not downloadable; production and editing of multimedia products (audiovisual recordings and computer programs) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, as well as research and design relating thereto; programming for computers; consultancy relating to information technology; design, development, configuration, installation, implementation, maintenance, updating, fault diagnosis, repair and upgrading of computer software; computer and computer hardware design and development services; software engineer services for data processing programs and process control; testing services for computer hardware and software used with alarm and surveillance systems; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; engineering and computer engineering services in connection with the planning and configuration of controlled environments, in particular for white rooms; design of clean rooms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |