USPTO serial 79192498
KAVKAZSKAYA PLENNITSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5393242Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2018
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAVKAZSKAYA PLENNITSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |