USPTO serial 79192552
SYSTEM-DRIVEN ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYSTEM-DRIVEN ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for design and development of software for modeling and simulation; software and software packages (software toolboxes); software for text or graphic editing, for measuring data, reading or writing, collecting, storing, converting, processing, broadcasting, transmitting, description, modeling of data (unlimited in terms of shape or content) and static or dynamic data models; software for creation and generation (assisted or automatic) of algorithms and digital simulation software; digital simulation and modeling software platform, simulation protocol software platform; embedded software (software integrated in an electronic system that it controls), all these goods intended for companies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Rental of access time to servers (for calculating, modeling) and services remotely accessible via computer networks, the aforesaid services intended for companies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer servers and software; technological and scientific studies for companies (engineering work); scientific advisory services; research and design services in connection with data integration (engineering work); scientific research and design services in connection with establishment of models (static or dynamic) and integration of said models (engineering work); design, installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; design of computer systems and embedded systems; engineering services; design and development of programming languages; design and development of computer languages for simulation and modeling; computer programming services; technical project studies; creation and maintenance of Internet sites and chat forums; design (ontology) and development services for databases, namely: database programming; all these services intended for companies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 9, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |