Drawing for KREMPEL

USPTO serial 79192559

KREMPEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KREMPEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Oven heat resistant pads; coasters (tableware); porcelain coasters; saucers for flower pots; coasters, not of paper and other than table linen; pot stands; stands for dishes; insulating sleeve holder for beverage cups; ceramics for kitchen use; butlers' trays; lazy susans; mug racks; teapot stands; meal trays; heat insulated domestic vessels of porcelain; heat insulated domestic vessels of earthenwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 8, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance