Drawing for ECO CASTING

USPTO serial 79192622

ECO CASTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5388751Status 708Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 30, 2018
Examiner
MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ECO CASTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Brucker

William J. Brucker STETINA GARRED BRUCKER & NEWBOLES75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys for cast parts for motors and engines, namely, engine blocks, cylinder heads, camshafts and crankshafts and for brake disksACTIVE—
007Motors and engines, except for land vehicles, and parts for motors and engines, except for land vehicles, namely, cast parts, namely, engine blocks, cylinder heads, camshafts and crankshafts; parts for land vehicle motors and engines, namely, engine blocks, cylinder heads, camshafts and crank shafts and for brake disksACTIVE—
012[Motors for land vehicles]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Foundry services, namely, metal casting of castings for othersACTIVE—
042Engineering services in the field of metal casting; technological consultancy on the design of castings; design of castingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 10, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 30, 2025INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 13, 2025WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2025WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 9, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2024C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 30, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 8, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance