USPTO serial 79192719
ECHIDNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECHIDNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; computer software applications (downloadable); computer software programs for database management; data processing software; cards incorporating electronic chips; cards incorporating electronic devices; cards incorporating integrated circuits; cards incorporating microprocessors; cards bearing magnetic or encoded data for input; value cards (machine readable); value cards for financial purposes (machine readable or magnetic); storage cards (smart cards); cards for use as data carriers (encoded or magnetic) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the design and development of computer software; development of computer software; design of computer software; computer software advisory services; hosting of software as a service (saas) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |