USPTO serial 79192873
RETAIL CONSULT SPECIALIST IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR RETAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETAIL CONSULT SPECIALIST IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR RETAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer system analysis; computer analysis; design and development of systems for data input, output, processing, display and storage; design and development of data storage systems; design and development of data display systems; design and development of data processing systems; design and development of data entry systems; design and development of electronic database software; development of computer systems; development of systems for the processing data; development of systems for the storage of data; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; software development, programming and implementation; integration of computer systems and networks; research in the field of information technology; research relating to data processing; technical research relating to computeres; techhnological research relating to computers; it consultancy, advisory and information services; computer projecct management services; computer research services; data migration services; technological services relating to computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |