Drawing for GRAN MAGDALA

USPTO serial 79192940

GRAN MAGDALA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GRAN MAGDALA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J SCOTT GERIEN DICKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 FIRST STREET SUITE 301NAPA, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Orange liqueurABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 1, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 1, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 4, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance