Drawing for MIS EN BOUTEILLES AU CHATEAU LE CHATEAU EN 1873 CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT CAHORS APPELATION CAHORS CONTROLEE S.C.A. CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT . FLORESSAS . LOT

USPTO serial 79193034

MIS EN BOUTEILLES AU CHATEAU LE CHATEAU EN 1873 CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT CAHORS APPELATION CAHORS CONTROLEE S.C.A. CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT . FLORESSAS . LOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5258246Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2017
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MIS EN BOUTEILLES AU CHATEAU LE CHATEAU EN 1873 CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT CAHORS APPELATION CAHORS CONTROLEE S.C.A. CHATEAU DE CHAMBERT . FLORESSAS . LOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maurice B. Pilosof

Maurice B. Pilosof MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ.PO Box 691937West Hollywood, CA 90069UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines made from grapes from Cahors, France in accordance with specific standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance