Drawing for VESCENT

USPTO serial 79193325

VESCENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5215797Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 6, 2017
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VESCENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Ave., NWWashington, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Application development software, computer application software for mobile telephones, portable media players, electronic tablets and handheld computers for use in connection with providing users with techniques to improve and optimize napping, sleeping and relaxation and for creating, offering and delivering online conferences, meetings, demonstrations, presentations, and discussions and user manuals; computer software used for research, study, purchase and downloading of electronic games and software applicationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Commercial business management; commercial business administrationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 31, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 6, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 6, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance