USPTO serial 79193389
1898
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5225414Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2017
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1898?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Albumin milk; colza oil for food; corn oil; edible oils; linseed oil for culinary purposes; low-fat potato chips; potato chips; sunflower oil for food; sunflower seeds, prepared | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Barley meal; bread; cake dough; cereal bars; cereal-based snack food; chips in the nature of cereal products, namely, grain-based chips, corn-based chips, oat-based chips, rye-based chips, buckwheat-based chips, wheat-based chips, barley-based chips; corn flakes; corn flour; crushed barley; crushed oats; dough; flour; gingerbread; groats for human food; high-protein cereal bars; hominy grits; husked barley; husked oats; macaroni; muesli; noodles; oat flakes; oat-based food, namely, oat flakes, rolled oats; oatmeal; pasta; pastry dough; pies; rice; semolina; spaghetti; unleavened bread; vermicelli in the nature of noodles; wheat flour; cereal preparations, namely, ready-to-eat cereals, breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack food and cereal flakes that are processed cereals, namely, rolled oats, rolled rye, rolled maize, rolled buckwheat, rolled wheat, rolled barley, instant oatmeal, corn-based snack foods, puffed corn snacks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
- Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
- Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Association "Soyuzpichsheprom"
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named 1898
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |