Drawing for DETECTOR INSPECTOR

USPTO serial 79193562

DETECTOR INSPECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5455534Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2018
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DETECTOR INSPECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Kleinman

Robert Kleinman Common Sense Counsel404 West 7th StreetAustin, TX 78701United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance, servicing and repair of lighting, electrical systems, specialized building systems, fire detection systems, fire protection systems, security systems, alarms and gas home appliances; provision of information in relation to the repair, maintenance and installation of smoke detection systems, fire detection systems, alarms and fire protection systems; replacement of batteries; installation, maintenance and repair of electronic measuring devices, namely, fire, gas and smoke detection systems; cleaning services, namely, cleaning of fire and safety equipment; cleaning consultancy and advisory services, namely, consulting and advice in the field of cleaning of fire and safety equipment and installation of central vacuum cleaning systems; and installation of central vacuum cleaning systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2024PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Dec 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 1, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 1, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance