Drawing for LDNIO

USPTO serial 79193697

LDNIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5348176Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2017
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LDNIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices; Computer mouse; cabinets for loudspeakers; [ calculating machines; ] chargers for electric batteries; [ Data processing apparatus, namely, optical readers and RFID readers; Blank optical data carriers; ] Electrical connections in the form of plugs, sockets, and contacts; batteries, electric; Materials for electricity mains, namely, electrical wires and electric cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 7, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 7, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2017FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jul 28, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance