USPTO serial 79193697
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Siyoteam Technology Co., Ltd
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer peripheral devices; Computer mouse; cabinets for loudspeakers; [ calculating machines; ] chargers for electric batteries; [ Data processing apparatus, namely, optical readers and RFID readers; Blank optical data carriers; ] Electrical connections in the form of plugs, sockets, and contacts; batteries, electric; Materials for electricity mains, namely, electrical wires and electric cables | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |