Drawing for OLINDA

USPTO serial 79193711

OLINDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5211395Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2017
Examiner
YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLINDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz-Ponce

Taizhou Renhe Trade mark Agency Co., LtdRoom 702-3, Block A,Taizhou International Business Center,Zhejiang Province,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural seed planting machines, namely, sowers; weeding machines; mowing and reaping machines; agricultural machines, namely, seed drills, cultivators, harvestors, disk harrows, seeders; drainage machines, namely, trench cutters; spraying machines; machines, namely, power-operated atomisers for industrial or commercial use; reapers; agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, hay balers, tractor towed rollers, and rotators in the nature of harvestors; motorized cultivatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 28, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 16, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 15, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 30, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 21, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance