Drawing for SWIFT WIFI

USPTO serial 79193847

SWIFT WIFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SWIFT WIFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing apparatus; blank USB flash drives; computer software and downloadable computer software used to facilitate the use of wireless networks by allowing users to search for Internet wireless networks, to search for wireless network availability, to access and connect to wireless networks, and to share wireless network hotspots; computer peripheral devices; digital cameras; computer game programs; electronic book readers; eyeglasses; portable energy sources, namely, rechargeable batteries; network communication equipment, namely, computer network adapters, bridges, servers, routers and switches; Video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoonsACTIVE—
038Wireless broadcasting; cellular telephone communication; communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; providing Internet chatrooms; providing access to databases; providing online forums; streaming of data; online transmission services, namely, message sending; teleconferencing servicesACTIVE—
042Research and development of new products for others; industrial design; computer system design; providing search engines for the Internet; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitation of the use of wireless networks through the searching for and sharing of wireless networks and hotspots; off-site data backup; electronic data storage; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; maintenance of computer software; computer programming; information technology (IT) consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 24, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 24, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 16, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 25, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 25, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance