USPTO serial 79193847
SWIFT WIFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWIFT WIFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; blank USB flash drives; computer software and downloadable computer software used to facilitate the use of wireless networks by allowing users to search for Internet wireless networks, to search for wireless network availability, to access and connect to wireless networks, and to share wireless network hotspots; computer peripheral devices; digital cameras; computer game programs; electronic book readers; eyeglasses; portable energy sources, namely, rechargeable batteries; network communication equipment, namely, computer network adapters, bridges, servers, routers and switches; Video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless broadcasting; cellular telephone communication; communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; providing Internet chatrooms; providing access to databases; providing online forums; streaming of data; online transmission services, namely, message sending; teleconferencing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of new products for others; industrial design; computer system design; providing search engines for the Internet; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitation of the use of wireless networks through the searching for and sharing of wireless networks and hotspots; off-site data backup; electronic data storage; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; maintenance of computer software; computer programming; information technology (IT) consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shanghai Zihuan Network Technology Co.,Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI ZHANGMEN TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SWIFT WIFI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |