Drawing for SINO GRINDING

USPTO serial 79193852

SINO GRINDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5153361Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2017
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SINO GRINDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Jacques

Rachel Jacques Maschoff Brennan1389 Center Drive, Suite 300Park City, UT 84098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Grinding media of metal in the nature of steel grinding balls, steel grinding rods and balls of steel for grinding purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 18, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 18, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 28, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 7, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 11, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 26, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance