Drawing for FLODOR

USPTO serial 79193888

FLODOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLODOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs, milk and other dairy products; preserves, pickles (particularly potato flakes and chips)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from cereals (excluding pasta); bread, biscuits, cookies, cakes, pastry and confectionery, edible ices; honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder; iceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 7, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance