USPTO serial 79194001
BREWD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5319262Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2017
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREWD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-2930 Brasschaat, BE
B-2930 Brasschaat, BE
B-2930 Brasschaat, BE
Bree, BE
Bree, BE
Bree, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura BlvdSuite 360Encino, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit-based beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making fruit-based beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Van Osta
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Van Osta
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Van Osta
- Other trademarks owned by Bert van Hecke
- Other trademarks owned by Bert van Hecke
- Other trademarks owned by Bert van Hecke
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BREWD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |