USPTO serial 79194054
DISRUPTIVE INVESTMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISRUPTIVE INVESTMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment analysis; investment brokerage; financial investment advisory services; investment services; investment information; investment consultancy; trust investment services; investment trusteeship services; equity capital investment; real estate investment; fund investments; investment management; arranging of investments; administration of investment funds; investment risk assessment services; provision of investment capital; private client investment services; securities investment services; investment asset management; development of investment portfolios; investment portfolio management services; financial investment management services; provision of investment information; acquisition for financial investment; financial management relating to investment; financial investment brokerage; arranging of financial investments; financial advice relating to investment; financial investment analysis and stock research; commercial property investment services; investment services relating to transferable securities; financial planning and investment advisory services; investment of money (services for -); venture capital and project capital investment services; private equity fund investment services; private placement and venture capital investment services; securities investment services for personal investors; equity investment in international companies; financing of investments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |