USPTO serial 79194236
DIVI PUT.ON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVI PUT.ON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
66538 Neunkirchen, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; furniture units; screens furniture; partitions furniture; partitions of plastic materials furniture; partitions not of metal furniture; partitions of metal furniture; partitions of textile materials furniture; portable partitions furniture; mobile partitions furniture; dividers furniture; dividers of plastic materials; furniture; dividers not of metal furniture; dividers of metal furniture; dividers of textile materials furniture; dividers of plastic materials comprising interconnected panels furniture; dividers not of metal comprising interconnected panels furniture; dividers of metal comprising interconnected panels furniture; dividers of textile materials comprising interconnected panels furniture; movable office dividers; modular furniture; modular elements of metal furniture; multi-positional display stands furniture; table tops; benches; benches of metal; frames for pavilions furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |