Drawing for ONECORE

USPTO serial 79194237

ONECORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5206915Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2017
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONECORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET G RICCIUTI

JANET G RICCIUTI JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC1830 S STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental composite materials for use in creating dental inlays, onlays, dental crowns, bridges, artificial teeth and denturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Artificial teeth; dental inlays and onlays; pins for artificial teeth; dental crowns; dental bridges; dental root post and implants; dental products and materials, namely, cutting and grinding discs for dental applications, tooth models and preformed artificial teeth for use in machining and manufacturing dental inlays, onlays, dental crowns, bridges, artificial teeth and denturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 19, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 8, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance