USPTO serial 79194348
AUTOMATICLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5268433Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2017
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMATICLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy D. Gross
Roy D. Gross The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC50 Washington StreetNorwalk, CT 06897UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting and development services in the field of computers, electronics, engineering and physics, namely, Design and development of computer hardware for others, Design and development of wireless computer networks for others, Research and development services in connection with physics, and Technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware systems, all not for use with diagnostic testing of automobile and land vehicles as well as temperature and energy management systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 9, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |