USPTO serial 79194431
HIFORMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6015558Status 708Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2020
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HIFORMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants; colorants, namely, color master batches in liquid form; colorants, namely, liquid master batches containing pigment; colorants, namely, liquid master batches containing dye; colorants, namely, liquid color master batches containing additives; none of the aforementioned containing resins | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Chemical research services to develop innovations, mainly carrier systems, dosing units and service concepts for liquid color master batches; Scientific and technological design services, namely, design services for customers to design new products in the nature of new product design services for liquid color master batches and for equipment for producing liquid color master batches ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2017 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |