Drawing for RSCHIP

USPTO serial 79194478

RSCHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RSCHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control apparatus; monitoring apparatus, electric; igniting apparatus, electric, for igniting at a distance; simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; microprocessors; computer software, recorded; speed checking apparatus for vehicles; regulating apparatus, electric; steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles; chips integrated circuitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance