Drawing for Serial No. 79194579

USPTO serial 79194579

Serial No. 79194579

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5430381Status 406
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2018
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79194579?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua B. Goldberg

Joshua B. Goldberg Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; lithia water; seltzer water; soda water; water beverages; aerated water; mineral water; table waters; kvass in the nature of non-alcoholic beverage; cocktails, non-alcoholic; lemonades; Non-alcoholic peanut milk beverages not being a milk substitute; milk of almonds for beverage; isotonic beverages; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; aloe vera drinks, non-alcoholic; whey beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; orgeat in the nature of syrups for making beverages; beer; ginger beer; malt beer; powders for making non-alcoholic effervescing beverages; sarsaparilla in the nature of non-alcoholic beverage; syrups for lemonade; syrups for beverages; smoothies; tomato juice beverages; cider, non-alcoholic; vegetable juice beverages; fruit juices; preparations for making aerated water; essences used in the preparation of liqueurs not in the nature of essential oils; preparations for making mineral water; unfermented must; grape must, unfermented; beer wort; malt wort; pastilles for making effervescing beverages; sherbet beverages; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; extracts of hops for making beer; essences for making non-alcoholic beverages not in the nature of essential oilsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
033Aperitifs; arrack arak; brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; anisette liqueur; kirsch; gin; digesters in the nature of liqueurs and spirits; prepared alcoholic cocktails; curacao; anise liqueur; liqueurs; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; alcoholic beverages, except beer; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits in the nature of alcoholic beverages; distilled beverages in the nature of spirits; mead in the nature of hydromel; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; nira in the nature of sugarcane-based alcoholic beverage; rum; sake; perry; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts, alcoholic; alcoholic essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2021TRPTREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL—
Jan 25, 2021ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jan 22, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 3, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 25, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 3, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance