USPTO serial 79194686
DATAMINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATAMINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
CLIFFORD D HYRA Fresh IP PLC11710 Plaza America Dr., Ste 2000RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for managing networks of broadcast-specific devices in the satellite industry and the broadcasting sector, namely, for management and configuration of broadcast-specific devices including encoders, modulators, and RF signal routers, and for setting up broadcast services across chains of devices from different vendors, and to monitor the status of the broadcast devices and facilitate the remote control of those devices, and showcase errors and defects in the networks of broadcast devices; software for operation support systems in the nature of software to monitor, control, analyze and manage a network of broadcast-specific devices in the satellite industry and the broadcasting sector, namely, for management and configuration of broadcast-specific devices including encoders, modulators, and RF signal routers, and for setting up broadcast services across chains of devices from different vendors, and to monitor the status of the broadcast devices and facilitate the remote control of those devices, and showcase errors and defects in the networks of broadcast devices; computer hardware and software for managing, monitoring and securing networks, computer disk drives, electronic data storage systems, databases and other storage media via computer, namely, for management and configuration of broadcast-specific devices including encoders, modulators, and RF signal routers, and for setting up broadcast services across chains of devices from different vendors, and to monitor the status of the broadcast devices and facilitate the remote control of those devices, and showcase errors and defects in the networks of broadcast devices; all of the aforesaid goods exclusively relating to mobile telecommunications, internet, television and satellite services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems in the field of computers, software and hardware, storage networks for computers, storage media for computers, namely, monitoring the status of broadcast-specific devices in the satellite industry and the broadcasting sector, including encoders, modulators, and RF signal routers, and showcasing errors and defects in the broadcast-specific devices; technical support services, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer networks systems in the nature of managing, monitoring and protecting computer networks, computer disk drives, electronic data storage systems, databases and other storage media via computer networks, namely, monitoring the status of broadcast-specific devices in a network, including encoders, modulators, and RF signal routers, and showcasing errors and defects in the broadcast-specific devices; technical support services, namely, providing backup computer programs and facilities; aforementioned services rendered in the context of mobile telecommunications, internet, television, and satellite services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |