Drawing for PAZU

USPTO serial 79194904

PAZU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAZU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Koffsky

Mark I. Koffsky Koffsky Schwalb LLC349 Fifth Avenue, Suite 733New York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer games; computer games software; downloadable computer games software; computer software platform for programming, design and development of computer gamesACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, dolls, dolls accessories, plastic toy figures, plastic toy figures accessories, sold separately and as kitsACTIVE—
041Online game services; online game services provided via Internet and other communication networksACTIVE—
042Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games and game applications, enhancements within online computer games, and game applications within online computer games; providing online reviews of computer games, and providing of information relating to computer games; providing an internet website portal in the field of computer games and gaming; entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact through social games for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 22, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 18, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 13, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance