USPTO serial 79195005
AUPING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5393255Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2018
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUPING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; beds; mattresses; pillows; furniture parts; furniture accessories, namely, bed headboards, bedside tables, storage and organization systems comprising shelves, drawers, cupboards, baskets and clothes rods sold as a unit, shelving and component parts thereof, namely, shelves and brackets sold as a unit, mattress toppers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Bed linens, bed blankets, bed sheets, duvets, bed covers, eiderdowns | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Auping B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Auping B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Auping B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named AUPING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Aug 29, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |