USPTO serial 79195029
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger STUDEBAKER BRACKETT PLLC8255 Greensboro DriveSuite 300Tysons, VA 22102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for image processing, 3D image processing, image management, image encryption, image analysis, image matching, centralization of images, 3D surface reconstruction, 3D modeling, 3D simulation; Computer software for Image analysis; distance measuring apparatus, telemeters, light beams pointers in the nature of laser pointers or luminous pointers using parallel light sources created by lenses; secure data transmission systems comprising software and hardware for image transmission, electronic case report forms transmission, and voice transmission; Data analysis software for assistance with medical diagnosis; software for medical image analysis; software for [ X-ray scanner analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance image analysis, ultrasound analysis, nuclear medicine image analysis and ] 2D and 3D digital photography analysis [; blank magnetic data storage media; blank digital image storage media; medical information media, namely, hard drives, magnetic tapes, USB key, SD cards, CD-ROM, DVDs, and magnetic data carriers, all featuring medical information; computers; two dimensional and 3D digital cameras; two dimensional and 3D video cameras; imaging devices, namely, nuclear research imaging apparatus in the nature of Ultra-Violet and Infra-Red imaging apparatus for imaging human or animal bodies, not for medical purposes; laser scanners and fringe projection scanners for reconstructing surfaces in 3D for research purposes; digital computer data servers; computer digital image servers ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ Surgical, ] medical [, dental and veterinary ] apparatus and instruments, namely imaging devices and distance measurement devices in the nature of a device that converges light beams such as lasers or light sources focused by lenses and producing light spots superposing at a given fixed distance for the purpose of fitting prosthesis, stereotaxic frames, repositioning devices in the nature of fixed frames or telescopic arms enabling the repositioning of subjects at a fixed distance or in a fixed position relative to a camera system for positioning patients during medical imaging procedures, [ surgery guides and frames designed in two or three dimensions to guide the trajectory of instruments during surgery; ] orthopedics apparatus for diagnostic [ and therapeutic ] use [, prosthesis for arms, hands, breast, legs, hips, nose and eye socket ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications services, namely electronic exchange of data in the nature of image data and electronic text documents relative to patient's condition and treatments via telecommunications networks; transfer of digital information data by telecommunications particularly medical information, digital images, clinical data and transmissions regarding medical treatment efficiency measurements; transmissions of medical images and information via computer terminals ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | [ Publishing of electronic periodicals featuring medical information and images via computer terminals ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering services, namely, development by engineers of qualitative and quantitative evaluation computer software [ and specialized cameras ] for human health assessment, specifically relative to the evolution of pathologies and diseases; [ development of image analysis methods; ] development of software; programming for computers; technological consulting in the field of computers, digital cameras, image acquisition systems and data transmission systems; design of client-server systems; design of computer systems for electronic timestamping, signatures and encryption | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2024 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |