Drawing for SPARK EXHAUST TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79195058

SPARK EXHAUST TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARK EXHAUST TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

848 Dodge Ave., Ste. 337Evanston, IL 60202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Exhaust silencers for engines, namely, aftermarket motorcycle engine exhaust systems comprised of one or more pipes, collectors, mufflers, manifolds, or heat shields, and automotive exhaust pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 24, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 23, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance