Drawing for M3 NITCOMB

USPTO serial 79195254

M3 NITCOMB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5352531Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2017
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with M3 NITCOMB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner Kenner Greive Bobak Taylor Weber106 South Main StreetSuite 400Akron, OH 44308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021CombACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 4, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance