USPTO serial 79195324
ALTERNATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTERNATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
JOHN J OMALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG PC30 SOUTH 17TH STREET SUITE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fodder; litter peat; beverages for pets; foodstuffs for puppies; yeast tablets for consumption by animals; foodstuffs for cats; edible dog treats; edible cat treats; edible treats for animals; synthetic animal feed; chewing bones for dogs; edible bones and sticks for pets; protein for animal fodder; cereals products for consumption by animals; animal forage fortified with mineral and vitamins, namely, hay, straw, food for all animals; foodstuffs for dogs; sanded paper for use in animal cages; sanded paper for pets litter; seeds prepared for consumption by animals; malt as unprocessed grain for feed for animals; meal for animals; animal foodstuffs for the weaning of animals; biscuits for animals; small animal litter; edible chews for animals; pet food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |