Drawing for SIBERMOTOR

USPTO serial 79195404

SIBERMOTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIBERMOTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Olga Zalomiy

Butolina Alla Valentinovna15250 Ventura Blvd., Suite 601Sherman Oaks, CA 91403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Drilling of deep oil or gas-wells; drilling of wells; pump repair; construction of oil wells and temporary and permanent sites for exploration and production of oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance