Drawing for RESILK

USPTO serial 79195484

RESILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5188874Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2017
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Goehring

Jeffrey M. Goehring Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Silk fabrics; silk based mixed fabrics; silk-wool mixed fabrics; wool-silk mixed fabrics; fabrics of synthetic fibers; silk and imitations of silkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Shirts, neckerchiefs, hosiery and underwear for men and women, ties, scarves, clothing for men and women, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets, pocket squares, ascot ties, footwear, headwear of silk or silk blendsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 1, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 11, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 10, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 25, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 25, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 11, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance