Drawing for ALTRO FORTIS

USPTO serial 79195533

ALTRO FORTIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5258300Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2017
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTRO FORTIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark N. Mutterperl

Mark N. Mutterperl Zeisler PLLC40 Rockefeller Plaza - Floor 20New York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal cladding for building, namely, panelling and sheets for walls and ceilings; Non-metal cladding for building, namely, PVC wall cladding sheetsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 7, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 16, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 24, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 23, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 8, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance