USPTO serial 79195587
DIRECTO AMUNDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECTO AMUNDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |